Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6391 - 6400 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6391 - 6400 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
Monica A. Tanner v. Julie A. Williams
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Parker v. Sullivan, 184 Wis. 2d 668, 679, 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5410 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Parker v. Sullivan, 184 Wis. 2d 668, 679, 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5410 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95714 - 2014-09-15
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95714 - 2014-09-15
State v. Curtis D. Jones
motions is undisputed, the issue is one of law and our review is de novo. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24523 - 2006-03-20
motions is undisputed, the issue is one of law and our review is de novo. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24523 - 2006-03-20
State v. Larry N. Henkel
that we review de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis.2d 433, 436, 456 N.W.2d 657, 659 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis.2d 433, 436, 456 N.W.2d 657, 659 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
Kathleen Barry-Chamberlain v. Department of Industry
the issue de novo, our conclusion is the same. See id. at 895, 498 N.W.2d at 832. We agree with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7974 - 2005-03-31
the issue de novo, our conclusion is the same. See id. at 895, 498 N.W.2d at 832. We agree with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry N. Henkel
that we review de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis.2d 433, 436, 456 N.W.2d 657, 659 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12465 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis.2d 433, 436, 456 N.W.2d 657, 659 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12465 - 2017-09-21
State v. James P.F.
. The application of law to undisputed facts is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2005-03-31
. The application of law to undisputed facts is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Beiersdorf, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. John J. Deluhery
judgment de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d 609, 613 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9663 - 2017-09-19
judgment de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513 N.W.2d 609, 613 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9663 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Brown, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Brown, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exists presents a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195667 - 2017-09-21
exists presents a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195667 - 2017-09-21