Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6391 - 6400 of 63577 for records.
Search results 6391 - 6400 of 63577 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212339 - 2018-05-09
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212339 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669757 - 2023-06-20
to the no-merit report, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669757 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136289 - 2015-03-02
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136289 - 2015-03-02
Jonathan P. Cole v. Gerald A. Berge
methodology if he prevails on his claim because the State does not assert, nor does the record show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4852 - 2005-03-31
methodology if he prevails on his claim because the State does not assert, nor does the record show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4852 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211209 - 2018-04-17
of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211209 - 2018-04-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, Iddings’ response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
, Iddings’ response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
might reasonably waive the preliminary hearing and rely on informal discovery. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
might reasonably waive the preliminary hearing and rely on informal discovery. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667863 - 2023-06-13
not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667863 - 2023-06-13