Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 641 - 650 of 30175 for de.

Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church and School-Freistadt v. Tower Insurance Company
by applying a de novo standard of review and a "gross excessiveness test." The decision by the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16503 - 2005-03-31

Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
or other officers to the positions, the City, de facto, unlawfully circumvented its contractual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12785 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Findings of Fact ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
of de minimus violations. The court discussed this petition at open rules conference on January
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21

R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
erroneously denied him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David A. Krier
not supported by the record. Both of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14912 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
by a court commissioner who suspended his obligation to pay maintenance. Rebecca requested a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Kenosha, WI 53140 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26

[PDF] R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), STATS., and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
of Bloomer, 2002 WI App 252, ¶12, 257 Wis. 2d 883, 653 N.W.2d 309 (despite de novo review, we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6764 - 2017-09-20