Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 641 - 650 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for harassment and dismissed the case. Petitioner sought de novo review, and appeared pro se at the hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573490 - 2022-10-04

[PDF] State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5158 - 2017-09-19

Allan B. Levin v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
for a de novo circuit court review of the record custodian’s decision. The Regents and the other two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5597 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
of de minimus violations. The court discussed this petition at open rules conference on January
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rule Order
of de minimus violations. The court discussed this petition at open rules conference on January
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165845 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
of Bloomer, 2002 WI App 252, ¶12, 257 Wis. 2d 883, 653 N.W.2d 309 (despite de novo review, we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6764 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the case on jurisdictional grounds, and the County sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121149 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
RIVER BANK OF DE SOTO f/n/a DE SOTO STATE BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAYMOND FISHER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8520 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See Pattermann v. Pattermann, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8663 - 2017-09-19