Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 641 - 650 of 29810 for des.
Search results 641 - 650 of 29810 for des.
State v. Agripino Barbosa
only a de minimus effect on the trial court’s decision. We therefore affirm the order denying sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3715 - 2005-03-31
only a de minimus effect on the trial court’s decision. We therefore affirm the order denying sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50, 53 (1996). We determine de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50, 53 (1996). We determine de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), STATS., and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19
him a de novo hearing on his action to recover excessive taxes under § 74.37(3)(d), STATS., and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. That case was dismissed. Levin filed a timely demand in the circuit court for a trial de novo. Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35997 - 2014-09-15
. That case was dismissed. Levin filed a timely demand in the circuit court for a trial de novo. Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35997 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Kenosha, WI 53140 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26
. Kenosha, WI 53140 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26
[PDF]
State v. David A. Krier
not supported by the record. Both of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14912 - 2017-09-21
not supported by the record. Both of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14912 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Findings of Fact ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Findings of Fact ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for harassment and dismissed the case. Petitioner sought de novo review, and appeared pro se at the hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573490 - 2022-10-04
for harassment and dismissed the case. Petitioner sought de novo review, and appeared pro se at the hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573490 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5158 - 2017-09-19
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5158 - 2017-09-19
Allan B. Levin v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
for a de novo circuit court review of the record custodian’s decision. The Regents and the other two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5597 - 2005-03-31
for a de novo circuit court review of the record custodian’s decision. The Regents and the other two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5597 - 2005-03-31