Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6401 - 6410 of 76923 for judgment for u s.
Search results 6401 - 6410 of 76923 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91084 - 2013-01-02
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91084 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
Walworth County DH&HS v. Dena D. C.
from orders of the circuit court for Walworth County: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19514 - 2017-09-21
from orders of the circuit court for Walworth County: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of appeals from a final judgment or final order” under WIS. STAT. ch. 55 “by the subject of the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635501 - 2023-03-22
of appeals from a final judgment or final order” under WIS. STAT. ch. 55 “by the subject of the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635501 - 2023-03-22
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Sandy A. Williams Circuit Court Judge 1201 S. Spring St. Port Washington, WI 53074-0994 Marylou
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128137 - 2014-11-23
To: Hon. Sandy A. Williams Circuit Court Judge 1201 S. Spring St. Port Washington, WI 53074-0994 Marylou
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128137 - 2014-11-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of default judgment [on August 6, 2013] subject to prove-up was the appropriate remedy” because Ricky V.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116168 - 2017-09-21
of default judgment [on August 6, 2013] subject to prove-up was the appropriate remedy” because Ricky V.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116168 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for challenging a judgment extending K
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175683 - 2017-09-21
filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for challenging a judgment extending K
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 37
or judgment appealed from. The docketing statement required under s. 809.10 (1) (d) shall be filed
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
or judgment appealed from. The docketing statement required under s. 809.10 (1) (d) shall be filed
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
[PDF]
WI 37
or judgment appealed from. The docketing statement required under s. 809.10 (1) (d) shall be filed
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
or judgment appealed from. The docketing statement required under s. 809.10 (1) (d) shall be filed
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360509 - 2021-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ELLEN K. BERZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773749 - 2024-03-07
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ELLEN K. BERZ, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773749 - 2024-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Joan Schmitz
.—Judgment affirmed. No(s). 99-3299-CR 4 This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16324 - 2017-09-21
.—Judgment affirmed. No(s). 99-3299-CR 4 This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16324 - 2017-09-21