Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64031 - 64040 of 68969 for had.
Search results 64031 - 64040 of 68969 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
that prior to entering his plea he had been informed by a Wisconsin Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33467 - 2008-07-22
that prior to entering his plea he had been informed by a Wisconsin Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33467 - 2008-07-22
State v. Colin N. Gelford
had no idea about Miranda motions, suppressing evidence, or psychological testing of child victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14072 - 2005-03-31
had no idea about Miranda motions, suppressing evidence, or psychological testing of child victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be decided solely upon admissible evidence. Noah L. argues that the trial court had two options
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15
to be decided solely upon admissible evidence. Noah L. argues that the trial court had two options
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 The material facts are not in dispute. Kerby had judgments of conviction that included express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257487 - 2020-04-16
. ¶2 The material facts are not in dispute. Kerby had judgments of conviction that included express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257487 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
indicated to the court that he had gone over the form with counsel, and is not now claiming to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101972 - 2017-09-21
indicated to the court that he had gone over the form with counsel, and is not now claiming to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and intelligently because his trial counsel misinformed him that the circuit court had decided and denied his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-08
, and intelligently because his trial counsel misinformed him that the circuit court had decided and denied his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
and Tillman because Fortier’s attorney had failed to identity an issue of arguable merit in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62656 - 2011-04-11
and Tillman because Fortier’s attorney had failed to identity an issue of arguable merit in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62656 - 2011-04-11
CA Blank Order
the intoxication defense because he believed he had no choice due to his attorney’s conclusion that the judge would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117693 - 2014-07-17
the intoxication defense because he believed he had no choice due to his attorney’s conclusion that the judge would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117693 - 2014-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
by the court’s observation that the Fishers had provided no submission “telling [the court] what the industry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136485 - 2015-03-03
by the court’s observation that the Fishers had provided no submission “telling [the court] what the industry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136485 - 2015-03-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
Security and public assistance benefits exceeds the earning capacity he could have expected had he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
Security and public assistance benefits exceeds the earning capacity he could have expected had he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15