Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64061 - 64070 of 68967 for had.

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
that the children vary in age and had behavioral problems. Based on these facts she argues that adoption would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
states that if he had been told at sentencing that he faced a maximum sentence of sixty years, “he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35638 - 2009-02-23

2007 WI APP 222
and denied that he had or wanted to proposition Ferguson. Accepting, however, as we must, Ferguson’s version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30332 - 2007-10-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his interests had the court not imposed the restrictions. Thus, the court appropriately exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174084 - 2017-09-21

WI 40 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing and...
of Administrative Oversight opposed the petition because a monitoring program for conditional admission had not yet
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65572 - 2011-06-07

[PDF] Industrial Investors v. DNR
if the certification is not filed as required by WIS. STAT. § 77.88(2)(e). In addition, Wells had the opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21629 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” State v. Gallion, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel J. Voigt
that the State had agreed to recommend a six-year cap on his sentence, rather than to a six-year cap on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
it took Dorman’s guilty pleas, the court had “no concerns whatsoever at that time that he understood every
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20

COURT OF APPEALS
of restitution even though he had such a right under § 973.20(13) & (14).[2] Indeed, in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40237 - 2009-08-31