Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64061 - 64070 of 68575 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that what society demands of you, what the natural law demands of you, what common decency demands of you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21

State v. Maurice A. Fields
a motion alleges facts that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4653 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by this author, that determined that sentences such as those imposed here were lawful. No. 2013AP1426-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106015 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
expressed great concern about case law stretching the exception in child sexual assault cases to the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75193 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶9 Whether a judge was impartial is a question of law that we review independently. Murray v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08

[PDF] State v. Tecia D.B.
on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.” David S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6835 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the offenses.4 The disposition selected was far less than the maximum aggregate sentence allowed by law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775975 - 2024-03-20

[PDF] Fond du Lac County Department of Social Services v. Samuel S.
.” The predispositional investigation report to the juvenile court detailed Christopher’s prior contacts with law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11899 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, 745 N.W.2d at 409 (footnote omitted). Whether an error is harmless is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113462 - 2014-06-02

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Hoeft
the clearly erroneous standard, but review application of the law to those facts without deference. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21