Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6411 - 6420 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 6411 - 6420 of 16449 for commentating.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The trial court commented that it was “struck by [Carmen’s] inconsistencies and maneuvers to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180948 - 2017-09-21
The trial court commented that it was “struck by [Carmen’s] inconsistencies and maneuvers to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Johnnie Phiffer
to the fact that I will not use those in this sentencing today. The following comments by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14410 - 2014-09-15
to the fact that I will not use those in this sentencing today. The following comments by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or obstructing it.” Hakes further testified, “Eventually … she started to cry, and then she made a comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132026 - 2017-09-21
or obstructing it.” Hakes further testified, “Eventually … she started to cry, and then she made a comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132026 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terry G. Betts
the first shifted the burden of proof, the second wrongly commented on Betts' silence, and the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8868 - 2017-09-19
the first shifted the burden of proof, the second wrongly commented on Betts' silence, and the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8868 - 2017-09-19
State v. Chue Moua
. The trial court went through its notes and then said it had reconsidered its preliminary comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11685 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court went through its notes and then said it had reconsidered its preliminary comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11685 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. And that’s all I’m asking of you. Salgado contends that these comments have no place in a criminal trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52963 - 2014-09-15
. And that’s all I’m asking of you. Salgado contends that these comments have no place in a criminal trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52963 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Candice C. Sheppard v. Thomas A. Starkey, M.D.
credible so that the jury could weigh the value of that testimony. Starkey claims this comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2210 - 2017-09-19
credible so that the jury could weigh the value of that testimony. Starkey claims this comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The trial court also touched on the fairness issue, commenting that: Because each of the parties ha[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35652 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court also touched on the fairness issue, commenting that: Because each of the parties ha[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35652 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Frank
was ineffective for failing to challenge witness testimony that improperly commented on the truthfulness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for failing to challenge witness testimony that improperly commented on the truthfulness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17640 - 2017-09-21
Kenneth Krebs v. David H. Schwarz
of context. The hearing examiner’s comment was made during a recitation of the historical facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11402 - 2005-03-31
of context. The hearing examiner’s comment was made during a recitation of the historical facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11402 - 2005-03-31