Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6411 - 6420 of 63198 for records.
Search results 6411 - 6420 of 63198 for records.
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98450 - 2013-06-24
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98450 - 2013-06-24
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
attorney. The record before this court does not disclose the results of the plethysmograph or Galli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
attorney. The record before this court does not disclose the results of the plethysmograph or Galli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431134 - 2021-09-28
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431134 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recounted Patrick’s lengthy juvenile and adult record to the circuit court, incorrectly stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98003 - 2014-09-15
recounted Patrick’s lengthy juvenile and adult record to the circuit court, incorrectly stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98003 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dwan L. Schuck
record indicates that she refused the breath test at 1:47 a.m., while the notice of intent to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13876 - 2014-09-15
record indicates that she refused the breath test at 1:47 a.m., while the notice of intent to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13876 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106272 - 2014-01-07
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the records and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106272 - 2014-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132564 - 2017-09-21
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132564 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136289 - 2015-03-02
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136289 - 2015-03-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177521 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13