Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64181 - 64190 of 64598 for b's.
Search results 64181 - 64190 of 64598 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. 2017-09-21T17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145483 - 2017-09-21
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. 2017-09-21T17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Schulpius
in a secure facility. Id., ¶42. ¶13 In his dissent, court of appeals Judge Charles B. Schudson concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20871 - 2017-09-21
in a secure facility. Id., ¶42. ¶13 In his dissent, court of appeals Judge Charles B. Schudson concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608025 - 2023-01-06
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608025 - 2023-01-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Gaultney
to a crime. There is no reason for us to interfere with the jury’s finding. 8 B. Sentencing ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25458 - 2017-09-21
to a crime. There is no reason for us to interfere with the jury’s finding. 8 B. Sentencing ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia Jocz v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of this subchapter. The examiners may make findings and orders under this section. (b) If the department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7726 - 2017-09-19
of this subchapter. The examiners may make findings and orders under this section. (b) If the department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7726 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mario Santiago Sanchez
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ROLAND B. DAY, C.J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16897 - 2017-09-21
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ROLAND B. DAY, C.J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16897 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 132
consistent with this opinion. ¶1 LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. This case is before the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27542 - 2014-09-15
consistent with this opinion. ¶1 LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. This case is before the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27542 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jesse H. Swinson
with a criminal gang, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 943.10(1)(f), 943.10(2)(b), 939.05, and 939.625(1)(a) (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4934 - 2017-09-19
with a criminal gang, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 943.10(1)(f), 943.10(2)(b), 939.05, and 939.625(1)(a) (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4934 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jesse H. Swinson
with a criminal gang, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 943.10(1)(f), 943.10(2)(b), 939.05, and 939.625(1)(a) (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4935 - 2017-09-19
with a criminal gang, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 943.10(1)(f), 943.10(2)(b), 939.05, and 939.625(1)(a) (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4935 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reject Powell’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge. B. Other Acts Evidence ¶17 Powell argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
reject Powell’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge. B. Other Acts Evidence ¶17 Powell argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26