Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 39032 for c's.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 39032 for c's.
Patrick P. Fee v. Board of Review for the Town of Florence
if it is devoted primarily to agricultural use. Wis. Stat. § 70.32(2)(c)1. Fee and Fogarty argue both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5434 - 2005-03-31
if it is devoted primarily to agricultural use. Wis. Stat. § 70.32(2)(c)1. Fee and Fogarty argue both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Attorney John Kenyatta Riley appeals from the report of the referee, Attorney Hannah C. Dugan, who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171911 - 2017-09-21
. Attorney John Kenyatta Riley appeals from the report of the referee, Attorney Hannah C. Dugan, who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171911 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
ARGUMENT: September 17, 2002 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17485 - 2017-09-21
ARGUMENT: September 17, 2002 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17485 - 2017-09-21
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
Argument: September 17, 2002 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County: Dane Judge: C. William
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17485 - 2005-03-31
Argument: September 17, 2002 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County: Dane Judge: C. William
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
-RESPONDENT, V. B. E. C., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05
-RESPONDENT, V. B. E. C., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05
State v. Tommie L. Cole
sentence. Except as provided in par. (c), the total length of the bifurcated sentence may not exceed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16603 - 2005-03-31
sentence. Except as provided in par. (c), the total length of the bifurcated sentence may not exceed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 64
. Cerjak and Rachel E. Potter of Cannon & Dunphy, S.C., Brookfield, and William C. Gleisner III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249029 - 2019-12-06
. Cerjak and Rachel E. Potter of Cannon & Dunphy, S.C., Brookfield, and William C. Gleisner III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249029 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Tommie L. Cole
of the following: (a) Total length of bifurcated sentence. Except as provided in par. (c), the total length
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21
of the following: (a) Total length of bifurcated sentence. Except as provided in par. (c), the total length
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: For the respondent-appellant there were briefs (in court of appeals) by Thomas C. Bellavia, assistant attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192165 - 2017-09-21
: For the respondent-appellant there were briefs (in court of appeals) by Thomas C. Bellavia, assistant attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192165 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2024AP1992 2024AP1993 4 § 48.977(4)(c)2.,”4 Nathaniel could not be served by mail.5 The order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
2024AP1992 2024AP1993 4 § 48.977(4)(c)2.,”4 Nathaniel could not be served by mail.5 The order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02