Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of facts put forth by the defendant constitutes a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887340 - 2024-12-11
of facts put forth by the defendant constitutes a “new factor” is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887340 - 2024-12-11
State v. Edward L. Wilson
review de novo. Id. ¶5 Wilson’s postconviction motion alleged that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. ¶5 Wilson’s postconviction motion alleged that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
Honey Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District v. Robert G. Langley
standard of reasonableness presents a question of law which we determine de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8323 - 2005-03-31
standard of reasonableness presents a question of law which we determine de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8323 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis B. Robinson
was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3343 - 2005-03-31
was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3343 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Vines
we review de novo. State v. Theriault, 187 Wis.2d 125, 131, 522 N.W.2d 254, 257 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9906 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Theriault, 187 Wis.2d 125, 131, 522 N.W.2d 254, 257 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9906 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106464 - 2014-01-08
: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106464 - 2014-01-08
State v. Steven P. Syrjala
of fact unless clearly erroneous, Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2), but we review de novo whether those facts meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7510 - 2005-03-31
of fact unless clearly erroneous, Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2), but we review de novo whether those facts meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7510 - 2005-03-31
State v. Damien Bolen
review de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105, 584 N.W.2d 709 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18277 - 2005-05-25
review de novo. State v. Cobbs, 221 Wis. 2d 101, 105, 584 N.W.2d 709 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18277 - 2005-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
to specific facts are questions of law we decide de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., 2004 WI 93, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26698 - 2006-10-09
to specific facts are questions of law we decide de novo. Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., 2004 WI 93, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26698 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175, 176 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94657 - 2013-04-01
of law we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175, 176 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94657 - 2013-04-01