Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 50107 for our.
Search results 6421 - 6430 of 50107 for our.
Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
. DISCUSSION ¶9 On certiorari review, we limit our review to (1) whether the Board kept within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶9 On certiorari review, we limit our review to (1) whether the Board kept within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5370 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew J. Trecroci
not agree with some of the trial court’s findings of fact, it does not challenge them given our “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31
not agree with some of the trial court’s findings of fact, it does not challenge them given our “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
" in character. United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 34-35 (2000) (footnotes omitted). Our discussion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131183 - 2017-09-21
" in character. United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 34-35 (2000) (footnotes omitted). Our discussion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131183 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
relies on a view of the evidence that is not, as our standard of review requires, a view that is most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
relies on a view of the evidence that is not, as our standard of review requires, a view that is most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
State v. Ryan J. Frayer
not agree with some of the trial court’s findings of fact, it does not challenge them given our “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2520 - 2005-03-31
not agree with some of the trial court’s findings of fact, it does not challenge them given our “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2520 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
AND ANALYSIS ¶7 The facts relevant to our discussion are not in dispute. It is not disputed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131183 - 2005-03-31
AND ANALYSIS ¶7 The facts relevant to our discussion are not in dispute. It is not disputed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by counsel’s performance. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Our first question is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314604 - 2020-12-15
by counsel’s performance. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Our first question is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314604 - 2020-12-15
State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
the seriousness of the offense and was consistent with the value our society attaches to the obligation of adults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25
the seriousness of the offense and was consistent with the value our society attaches to the obligation of adults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25
State v. James L. Anderson
. On appeal, our review of the sentence is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10031 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, our review of the sentence is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10031 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130018 - 2014-11-24
was informed of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130018 - 2014-11-24