Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64271 - 64280 of 83218 for simple case search.
Search results 64271 - 64280 of 83218 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. To demonstrate prejudice in a case resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101685 - 2017-09-21
by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. To demonstrate prejudice in a case resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101685 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
retroactive application of the amendments was improper. We disagree. ¶7 The resolution of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28698 - 2007-04-11
retroactive application of the amendments was improper. We disagree. ¶7 The resolution of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28698 - 2007-04-11
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
. June 9, 1998, ordered published July 29, 1998). Under the Goodchild[3] standard, “a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
. June 9, 1998, ordered published July 29, 1998). Under the Goodchild[3] standard, “a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrell Tyler
underlying his handling of a case. Here, the record is devoid of any transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9137 - 2005-03-31
underlying his handling of a case. Here, the record is devoid of any transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Weber
to “fully and fairly inform the jury of the rules of law applicable to the case and to assist the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7258 - 2017-09-20
to “fully and fairly inform the jury of the rules of law applicable to the case and to assist the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7258 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed the case. This appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶8 Sharpe argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239489 - 2019-04-23
and dismissed the case. This appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶8 Sharpe argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239489 - 2019-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. It went on to distinguish Baldwin’s case from Scales, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals case upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82395 - 2012-05-14
. It went on to distinguish Baldwin’s case from Scales, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals case upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82395 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
State v. Eva M. Bakken
nature that the state intends to use at trial that were taken in this case. The report doesn't speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8461 - 2017-09-19
nature that the state intends to use at trial that were taken in this case. The report doesn't speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8461 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Christopher Aslakson v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
2006 WI APP 35 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21200 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 35 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 939.22(4). At the time of the offense in this case, “substantial bodily harm” was defined as “bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45467 - 2014-09-15
. § 939.22(4). At the time of the offense in this case, “substantial bodily harm” was defined as “bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45467 - 2014-09-15