Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6431 - 6440 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 6431 - 6440 of 83278 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of child support, to conduct a job search and make ten “contacts” with potential employers each week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174757 - 2017-09-21
of child support, to conduct a job search and make ten “contacts” with potential employers each week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174757 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim of ineffective trial counsel; 3) denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized with a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159444 - 2017-09-21
claim of ineffective trial counsel; 3) denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized with a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159444 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and No. 2021AP53-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467337 - 2021-12-28
and No. 2021AP53-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467337 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Case ¶2 James was charged with armed robbery as party to a crime in March 2011. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108906 - 2017-09-21
of the Case ¶2 James was charged with armed robbery as party to a crime in March 2011. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108906 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interest of justice. We disagree and affirm. Background A. Nature of the Case ¶2 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
in the interest of justice. We disagree and affirm. Background A. Nature of the Case ¶2 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8637 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8637 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8638 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8638 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case, the elements the State needed to prove were that: (1) JM was the owner of property— meaning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162429 - 2017-09-21
in this case, the elements the State needed to prove were that: (1) JM was the owner of property— meaning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
“explained that we needed to search the apartment to check for ... anyone who could be inside, anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56777 - 2014-09-15
“explained that we needed to search the apartment to check for ... anyone who could be inside, anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56777 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
he “explained that we needed to search the apartment to check for ... anyone who could be inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56777 - 2007-05-21
he “explained that we needed to search the apartment to check for ... anyone who could be inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56777 - 2007-05-21