Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64301 - 64310 of 67439 for bhasia ⭕🏹 lens sony ⭕🏹 lens 24 70 sony ⭕🏹 lens sony 24 70 f2 8⭕🏹 bhasiacomvn ⭕🏹 bhasia.com.vn.
Search results 64301 - 64310 of 67439 for bhasia ⭕🏹 lens sony ⭕🏹 lens 24 70 sony ⭕🏹 lens sony 24 70 f2 8⭕🏹 bhasiacomvn ⭕🏹 bhasia.com.vn.
State v. Michael E. Learmont
of knowingly violating a temporary restraining order, as a repeat offender, contrary to §§ 813.12(8) and 939.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2009-07-29
of knowingly violating a temporary restraining order, as a repeat offender, contrary to §§ 813.12(8) and 939.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2009-07-29
State v. Miguel Rocha-Castro
Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶8 “The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5109 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶8 “The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5109 - 2005-03-31
Barbara Jean Staples v. Richard Jay Staples
of divorce. ¶8 In June 2001, Barbara sought relief from the judgment pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5145 - 2008-08-17
of divorce. ¶8 In June 2001, Barbara sought relief from the judgment pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5145 - 2008-08-17
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
theory of defense. ¶8 Next, Cottingham explains that the defense theory was based on his intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2013-07-09
theory of defense. ¶8 Next, Cottingham explains that the defense theory was based on his intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2013-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, Turner was not prejudiced by the court’s error. ¶8 “It is the general rule that under ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
, Turner was not prejudiced by the court’s error. ¶8 “It is the general rule that under ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
95-05 SCR Chapter 60
of state courts. (8) Reconsideration. Within 30 days after the distribution of a formal advisory
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1206 - 2005-03-31
of state courts. (8) Reconsideration. Within 30 days after the distribution of a formal advisory
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1206 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Ramirez-Marin constituted deficient performance. ¶8 Fourth, Napier argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22
Ramirez-Marin constituted deficient performance. ¶8 Fourth, Napier argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
] This appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶8 On appeal, Graham acknowledges that the guilty plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
] This appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶8 On appeal, Graham acknowledges that the guilty plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
State v. Patrick T. Glover
than normal stop at a stop sign alone did not justify a traffic stop). ¶8 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20709 - 2005-12-20
than normal stop at a stop sign alone did not justify a traffic stop). ¶8 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20709 - 2005-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion for plea withdrawal. ¶8 At the plea hearing, the parties indicated to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32995 - 2008-06-09
the motion for plea withdrawal. ¶8 At the plea hearing, the parties indicated to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32995 - 2008-06-09