Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64381 - 64390 of 68758 for had.
Search results 64381 - 64390 of 68758 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
is to determine our standard of review. At bottom, the issue is whether the officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34728 - 2008-12-02
is to determine our standard of review. At bottom, the issue is whether the officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34728 - 2008-12-02
County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
is conditional as to O’Donnell’s constitutional challenges which the trial court had previously dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31
is conditional as to O’Donnell’s constitutional challenges which the trial court had previously dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Price v. Jeremy L. Kraus
denied the motion, concluding that it had advised him of his right to a jury trial and the time to post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3321 - 2017-09-19
denied the motion, concluding that it had advised him of his right to a jury trial and the time to post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3321 - 2017-09-19
Spriggie Hensley v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
for declaratory relief,[2] it must nonetheless be dismissed for failure to allege that Hensley had exhausted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2128 - 2005-03-31
for declaratory relief,[2] it must nonetheless be dismissed for failure to allege that Hensley had exhausted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2128 - 2005-03-31
State v. Abel Silva
have been filed, what effect such motions may have had, what would have been discovered if discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7980 - 2005-03-31
have been filed, what effect such motions may have had, what would have been discovered if discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that their attorney had misstated the evidence. The Olsons further argue that the remark was especially prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68316 - 2014-09-15
that their attorney had misstated the evidence. The Olsons further argue that the remark was especially prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Clinton N. Mansker
3 plea was appropriate. To meet this burden, he had to show a basis for the plea by proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12052 - 2014-09-15
3 plea was appropriate. To meet this burden, he had to show a basis for the plea by proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12052 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the scene, he had seen Vasquez leaving 3 Pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24
to the scene, he had seen Vasquez leaving 3 Pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the criminal complaint, the victim called police to report that she had just been sexually assaulted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246519 - 2019-09-11
the criminal complaint, the victim called police to report that she had just been sexually assaulted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246519 - 2019-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
observations, Officer Wacker had reasonable suspicion to stop Preinfalk’s vehicle. Following the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94137 - 2013-03-13
observations, Officer Wacker had reasonable suspicion to stop Preinfalk’s vehicle. Following the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94137 - 2013-03-13