Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6451 - 6460 of 36003 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 6451 - 6460 of 36003 for affidavit of mailing.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a jury trial by filing the request with the court and mailing copies to all other parties within 15 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
a jury trial by filing the request with the court and mailing copies to all other parties within 15 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 15
or by certified mail upon the agency or one of its officials.” See WIS. STAT. § 227.53(1)(a)1., (a)2., (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770262 - 2024-04-10
or by certified mail upon the agency or one of its officials.” See WIS. STAT. § 227.53(1)(a)1., (a)2., (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770262 - 2024-04-10
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
or medical incapacity within 20 days of being served by ordinary mail a request for response to a grievance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16388 - 2017-09-21
or medical incapacity within 20 days of being served by ordinary mail a request for response to a grievance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conditions. We refer to this order as “the revision order.” ¶5 On November 5, 2018, the County mailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549631 - 2022-07-28
conditions. We refer to this order as “the revision order.” ¶5 On November 5, 2018, the County mailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549631 - 2022-07-28
2008 WI APP 186
to this court’s order on October 19, 2007: An Eligibility Evaluation Form (E-Form) was mailed to the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34688 - 2008-12-16
to this court’s order on October 19, 2007: An Eligibility Evaluation Form (E-Form) was mailed to the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34688 - 2008-12-16
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
that amount but that apparently the check was mislaid and never mailed. The referee further found
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16388 - 2005-03-31
that amount but that apparently the check was mislaid and never mailed. The referee further found
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16388 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 186
) was mailed to the defendant on May 23, 2007, with instructions to return it within 7 days. Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34688 - 2014-09-15
) was mailed to the defendant on May 23, 2007, with instructions to return it within 7 days. Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34688 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not consider whether Matthew Kosek’s affidavit, that he did not receive any report from the Hanauskas’ engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
not consider whether Matthew Kosek’s affidavit, that he did not receive any report from the Hanauskas’ engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. [4] Elroy argued below and on appeal that an affidavit he submitted with motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23
otherwise noted. [4] Elroy argued below and on appeal that an affidavit he submitted with motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29282 - 2007-07-23
State v. Terrance A. Garner
: (1) his brother’s affidavit constitutes newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3775 - 2005-03-31
: (1) his brother’s affidavit constitutes newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3775 - 2005-03-31