Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6451 - 6460 of 57152 for id.
Search results 6451 - 6460 of 57152 for id.
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A new factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A new factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Raddeman
id. at 407. Here, Raddeman had not previously been acquitted or convicted of either charge so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2157 - 2017-09-19
id. at 407. Here, Raddeman had not previously been acquitted or convicted of either charge so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2157 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. David W. Demler II
” is, at best, a weak reason for excusable neglect. Id. Where a lawyer did not answer a complaint because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2694 - 2017-09-19
” is, at best, a weak reason for excusable neglect. Id. Where a lawyer did not answer a complaint because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2694 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
by pleading guilty, due process requires that the defendant’s expectations be fulfilled.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
by pleading guilty, due process requires that the defendant’s expectations be fulfilled.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 16 (1992). James is bound by the same rules that apply to attorneys on appeal. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
N.W.2d 16 (1992). James is bound by the same rules that apply to attorneys on appeal. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
State v. Brad A. Raddeman
for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense. See id. at 407
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2011-06-22
for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense. See id. at 407
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
, interpretation of law, or finding of fact. Id. Whether an issue is one of fact or law is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4989 - 2017-09-19
, interpretation of law, or finding of fact. Id. Whether an issue is one of fact or law is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205934 - 2017-12-19
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205934 - 2017-12-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
must fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. Prejudice from deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
must fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. Prejudice from deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of proving by clear and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is ‘“a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2014-06-03
of proving by clear and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. A new factor is ‘“a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2014-06-03