Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6451 - 6460 of 16239 for search.
Search results 6451 - 6460 of 16239 for search.
[PDF]
State v. David M. Mosel
was taken to the police station because Mosel consented to go and consented to the frisk and search as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10848 - 2017-09-20
was taken to the police station because Mosel consented to go and consented to the frisk and search as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10848 - 2017-09-20
State v. David M. Mosel
and search as part of being transported to the police station. The State also argued that Fenton did have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
and search as part of being transported to the police station. The State also argued that Fenton did have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was being detained. He then forcefully placed Kestler in handcuffs, and searched him for weapons, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32258 - 2014-09-15
was being detained. He then forcefully placed Kestler in handcuffs, and searched him for weapons, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32258 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven E. Carr
, Carr went through the open door of the room of a sleeping resident and searched a pair of pants which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11433 - 2005-03-31
, Carr went through the open door of the room of a sleeping resident and searched a pair of pants which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11433 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by failing to suppress the evidence found during the search incident to his arrest.[1] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91694 - 2014-01-28
erred by failing to suppress the evidence found during the search incident to his arrest.[1] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91694 - 2014-01-28
State v. Debra J. Findlay
violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2841 - 2005-03-31
violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2841 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deshawn Reed
a search warrant at 1110 Randall Street in Beloit, where Deshawn Reed lived with Tawana Reed and Darrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12131 - 2005-03-31
a search warrant at 1110 Randall Street in Beloit, where Deshawn Reed lived with Tawana Reed and Darrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Debra J. Findlay
Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when he or she obtains a blood sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2841 - 2017-09-19
Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures when he or she obtains a blood sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2841 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that the police violated his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109906 - 2014-03-31
that the police violated his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109906 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anita Lusk
of the evidence, the false material is to be excised from the search warrant. If the remaining content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence, the false material is to be excised from the search warrant. If the remaining content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15