Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 91831 for 1.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 91831 for 1.
[PDF]
Love v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
and is a reasonable exemption under § 1 of Article VIII of the Wisconsin Constitution, we affirm. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8027 - 2017-09-19
and is a reasonable exemption under § 1 of Article VIII of the Wisconsin Constitution, we affirm. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8027 - 2017-09-19
Walter V. Lee v. David Paulson
, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. David Paulson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2707 - 2005-03-31
, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. David Paulson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2707 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth W. Mickelson
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2870 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2870 - 2005-03-31
State v. Danny W. Filter
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11234 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
. ¶1 CURLEY, J. Susan Schindelholz appeals from the trial court judgment dismissing her claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20
. ¶1 CURLEY, J. Susan Schindelholz appeals from the trial court judgment dismissing her claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7336 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2023-24).1 For the following reasons, we affirm. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1140991 - 2026-07-08
(2023-24).1 For the following reasons, we affirm. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1140991 - 2026-07-08
[PDF]
Anthony Keller v. Barbara Keller
and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4559 - 2017-09-20
and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4559 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
., Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. No. 2007AP749-FT 2 ¶1 PETERSON, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29633 - 2014-09-15
., Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. No. 2007AP749-FT 2 ¶1 PETERSON, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29633 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP846-FT 2 ¶1 REILLY, P.J. 1 B.C. appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218416 - 2018-09-05
, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP846-FT 2 ¶1 REILLY, P.J. 1 B.C. appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218416 - 2018-09-05
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas L. Gillen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas L. Gillen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31