Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 68892 for he.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 68892 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Quintin D. L'Minggio
the denial. ¶2 L’Minggio admits in his brief that he had sexual intercourse with a child over the age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3973 - 2017-09-20
the denial. ¶2 L’Minggio admits in his brief that he had sexual intercourse with a child over the age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3973 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, he opened the door, where he observed a man and a woman. It is further undisputed that the man
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226915 - 2018-11-08
, he opened the door, where he observed a man and a woman. It is further undisputed that the man
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226915 - 2018-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, during which he admitted to watching adult and bestiality (women having sex with animals) pornography
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
, during which he admitted to watching adult and bestiality (women having sex with animals) pornography
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
in restitution. He contends the circuit court erred when calculating restitution because it improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29
in restitution. He contends the circuit court erred when calculating restitution because it improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues he was entitled to a default judgment or summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
for a writ of habeas corpus. He argues he was entitled to a default judgment or summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Andrew J. Biller
, which we have re-ordered for ease of analysis. First, he contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8759 - 2017-09-19
, which we have re-ordered for ease of analysis. First, he contends that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8759 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
requires Saunders to allege substantial issues of fact as to events in which he participated before his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8053 - 2017-09-19
requires Saunders to allege substantial issues of fact as to events in which he participated before his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8053 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Montgomery grabbed a gun and went outside. ¶3 According to Montgomery’s statement to police, when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
. Montgomery grabbed a gun and went outside. ¶3 According to Montgomery’s statement to police, when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brown did not testify at trial. ¶5 Bogan testified as follows. On September 16, 2006, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54590 - 2010-09-20
. Brown did not testify at trial. ¶5 Bogan testified as follows. On September 16, 2006, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54590 - 2010-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 939.32 (2001–02).1 He appeals pro se from the order denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005–06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15
, 939.32 (2001–02).1 He appeals pro se from the order denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005–06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15