Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64601 - 64610 of 82626 for simple case.
Search results 64601 - 64610 of 82626 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
), (j) and (m).[3] Given the unique circumstances of this case, these were the relevant factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79982 - 2012-03-27
), (j) and (m).[3] Given the unique circumstances of this case, these were the relevant factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79982 - 2012-03-27
CA Blank Order
paraphernalia. Meindel ultimately agreed to resolve his case with a plea bargain. In exchange for his pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2005-03-31
paraphernalia. Meindel ultimately agreed to resolve his case with a plea bargain. In exchange for his pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
because the fingerprint match made it “a solid, good case,” Owens responded, “[I]t is what it is, man
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94098 - 2013-03-19
because the fingerprint match made it “a solid, good case,” Owens responded, “[I]t is what it is, man
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94098 - 2013-03-19
City of Madison v. William J. Sanders
to be prepared by a reporter independent of a party to the case. Sanders relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2014-06-09
to be prepared by a reporter independent of a party to the case. Sanders relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2014-06-09
Frontsheet
2013 WI 36 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP314-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96073 - 2013-04-29
2013 WI 36 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP314-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96073 - 2013-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
a violation of the treaty in a domestic criminal case.” See id., ¶1. The circuit court concluded that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28631 - 2007-04-02
a violation of the treaty in a domestic criminal case.” See id., ¶1. The circuit court concluded that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28631 - 2007-04-02
State v. Brian W. Easton
in this case are not in dispute, and we decide de novo whether those facts “meet the appropriate legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3102 - 2005-03-31
in this case are not in dispute, and we decide de novo whether those facts “meet the appropriate legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3102 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pedro P. Avila
in Dodge county in a related case against Avila. Defense counsel filed the transcript of that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9354 - 2008-02-06
in Dodge county in a related case against Avila. Defense counsel filed the transcript of that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9354 - 2008-02-06
County of Burnett v. Daniel F. Kaye
the legislative intent, it is the court's duty to apply that intent to the case at hand and not look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16098 - 2005-03-31
the legislative intent, it is the court's duty to apply that intent to the case at hand and not look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16098 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(ng). Relevant to this case, § 23.33(1)(ng)1. defines a UTV as [a] motor driven device that does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111774 - 2007-12-26
)(ng). Relevant to this case, § 23.33(1)(ng)1. defines a UTV as [a] motor driven device that does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111774 - 2007-12-26