Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64661 - 64670 of 68967 for had.
Search results 64661 - 64670 of 68967 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Given that the April 15, 2019 Revocation Order and Warrant shows Rayford had already received credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
). Given that the April 15, 2019 Revocation Order and Warrant shows Rayford had already received credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
Peters & Vanden Heuvel v. Richard Vanden Heuvel
. On that point, the court noted that the parties agreed it had made a mathematical error, and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14575 - 2017-09-21
. On that point, the court noted that the parties agreed it had made a mathematical error, and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14575 - 2017-09-21
Leonard Jones v. Leon Kruchten, Sr.
by breaking through the door. Although the door broke, the police were unable to enter, because tenant had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14326 - 2005-03-31
by breaking through the door. Although the door broke, the police were unable to enter, because tenant had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Linda T. Sobish
that Sobish had committed prior abuses, Sobish argues that the jury could have concluded that she shook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3237 - 2005-03-31
that Sobish had committed prior abuses, Sobish argues that the jury could have concluded that she shook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3237 - 2005-03-31
Randall Doherty CPA, Inc. v. Ameritech Corporation
. Ameritech filed a motion seeking summary judgment, alleging that Doherty had no legal claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15127 - 2005-03-31
. Ameritech filed a motion seeking summary judgment, alleging that Doherty had no legal claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15127 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Backhaus
in a noncommercial setting, he or she had to be read all of the information on the Informing the Accused form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31
in a noncommercial setting, he or she had to be read all of the information on the Informing the Accused form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Conway
is there any showing that had the blood test evidence been successfully suppressed the State did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
is there any showing that had the blood test evidence been successfully suppressed the State did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had either already been decided or were “too late.” Campbell moved for reconsideration, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
had either already been decided or were “too late.” Campbell moved for reconsideration, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860611 - 2024-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel had explained the elements of the offense to him, and he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-08
counsel had explained the elements of the offense to him, and he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121169 - 2014-09-08
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
argument that the warden had no authority to uphold or affirm the decision because he did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
argument that the warden had no authority to uphold or affirm the decision because he did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31