Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6471 - 6480 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Quentin D.
. No. 99-1130 3 was in jeopardy.” Although our review of the trial court’s legal conclusions is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15450 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lee J. Petrina v. James Barnard
. Summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9701 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jeffrey A. Librande v. Allstate Insurance Company
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7018 - 2017-09-20

Louie E. Aiello v. Gary R. McCaughtry
as the trial court. Our review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7904 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997). Despite
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94675 - 2013-04-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review. WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex, 2008 WI 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65381 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rise to a legal defense is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bantz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97208 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a hearing is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220610 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] NOTICE
is a matter of law this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel Inc., 210 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26733 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kathleen Barry-Chamberlain v. Department of Industry
or decide the issue de novo, our conclusion is the same. See id. at 895, 498 N.W.2d at 832. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7974 - 2017-09-19