Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6471 - 6480 of 63536 for records.

CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97968 - 2013-06-10

[PDF] State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132564 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498394 - 2022-03-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177600 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18

[PDF] State v. Titus Graham
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6688 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in part his request for the return of a security deposit. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07

State v. Choice W. E.
a lifestyle of, in effect, an adult criminal." We do not believe the record supports that conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9276 - 2005-03-31

State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
809.32, Stats. Ratcliff has responded to the report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31