Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64711 - 64720 of 77577 for j o e s.
Search results 64711 - 64720 of 77577 for j o e s.
[PDF]
NOTICE
) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31429 - 2014-09-15
) Newly-discovered evidence which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31429 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wells Oswalt
neither a harsh and unconscionable sentence nor a “new factor” that “strike[s] at the very purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10769 - 2017-09-20
neither a harsh and unconscionable sentence nor a “new factor” that “strike[s] at the very purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10769 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and, at the guilty plea hearing, the State said there had been a “[s]cri[ve]ner’s error” and that it was now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
and, at the guilty plea hearing, the State said there had been a “[s]cri[ve]ner’s error” and that it was now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lee Andrew Knowlin, Jr.
and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: EMILY S. MUELLER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5423 - 2017-09-19
and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: EMILY S. MUELLER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5423 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dillard Earl Kelley, Sr. v. State
the necessary deputy sheriffs as attending officers under s. 59.27(3) and the clerk of the circuit court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5319 - 2017-09-19
the necessary deputy sheriffs as attending officers under s. 59.27(3) and the clerk of the circuit court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5319 - 2017-09-19
State v. Danny L. Peterson
. ¶6 “To withdraw his plea after sentencing, [the defendant] need[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19
. ¶6 “To withdraw his plea after sentencing, [the defendant] need[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19
Cedric Albert Holze v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
]’s decision.”) (footnote omitted). By the Court.—Appeal dismissed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6840 - 2005-03-31
]’s decision.”) (footnote omitted). By the Court.—Appeal dismissed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Adams County: DANIEL S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Adams County: DANIEL S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
all arose out of use of a watercraft owned by an insured and “[s]uch coverage is unequivocally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367570 - 2021-05-18
all arose out of use of a watercraft owned by an insured and “[s]uch coverage is unequivocally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367570 - 2021-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. v. Tykila S., 2001 WI 110, ¶28, 246 Wis. 2d 1, 629 N.W.2d 768. ¶10 The burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
. v. Tykila S., 2001 WI 110, ¶28, 246 Wis. 2d 1, 629 N.W.2d 768. ¶10 The burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23