Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64771 - 64780 of 74838 for judgment for us.
Search results 64771 - 64780 of 74838 for judgment for us.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
a response. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
a response. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. ¶3 Probation revocation decisions are reviewable by writ of certiorari. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30
judgment. ¶3 Probation revocation decisions are reviewable by writ of certiorari. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Froilan Avila-Romo appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213764 - 2018-06-06
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Froilan Avila-Romo appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213764 - 2018-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶4 In March 2012, Edmonson filed the underlying Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95793 - 2013-04-22
and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶4 In March 2012, Edmonson filed the underlying Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95793 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Jeffrey David Clark appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207496 - 2018-01-24
. RULE 809.23(3). Jeffrey David Clark appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207496 - 2018-01-24
State v. Ricky A. Ducommun
. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: THOMAS H. BARLAND, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10178 - 2005-03-31
. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: THOMAS H. BARLAND, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10178 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark J. Anderson
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: dennis g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13777 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: dennis g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13777 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. The State charged Kubiak
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138093 - 2015-03-23
, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. The State charged Kubiak
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138093 - 2015-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 168 (Ct. App. 1984); Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6) (2007-08).[1] We will not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2009-03-04
N.W.2d 168 (Ct. App. 1984); Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6) (2007-08).[1] We will not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2009-03-04
Town of Oconomowoc v. Maurice Mihelich
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR., Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9875 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR., Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9875 - 2005-03-31