Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64781 - 64790 of 74838 for judgment for us.
Search results 64781 - 64790 of 74838 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“the relevant lower court judgment, order denying discretionary review, or order denying a timely petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798466 - 2024-05-14
“the relevant lower court judgment, order denying discretionary review, or order denying a timely petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798466 - 2024-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
a response. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
a response. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. ¶3 Probation revocation decisions are reviewable by writ of certiorari. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30
judgment. ¶3 Probation revocation decisions are reviewable by writ of certiorari. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶4 In March 2012, Edmonson filed the underlying Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95793 - 2013-04-22
and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶4 In March 2012, Edmonson filed the underlying Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95793 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Jeffrey David Clark appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207496 - 2018-01-24
. RULE 809.23(3). Jeffrey David Clark appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce, asserting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207496 - 2018-01-24
State v. Ricky A. Ducommun
. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: THOMAS H. BARLAND, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10178 - 2005-03-31
. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: THOMAS H. BARLAND, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10178 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark J. Anderson
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: dennis g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13777 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: dennis g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Hagedorn, JJ. Anthony T. Redick appeals from the judgment convicting him of possession with intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161129 - 2017-09-21
and Hagedorn, JJ. Anthony T. Redick appeals from the judgment convicting him of possession with intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
basis for appeal and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶4 In March 2012, Edmonson filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95793 - 2014-09-15
basis for appeal and summarily affirmed the judgment. ¶4 In March 2012, Edmonson filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95793 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven L. Stoflet
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: JACK AULIK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10548 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: JACK AULIK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10548 - 2017-09-20