Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 64871 - 64880 of 75055 for judgment for us.
Search results 64871 - 64880 of 75055 for judgment for us.
CA Blank Order
Mueller appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
Mueller appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child and an order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Michael Endries appeals from a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522055 - 2022-05-17
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Michael Endries appeals from a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522055 - 2022-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. ¶2 A jury found Hennings guilty of felony murder.[2] After judgment was entered, Hennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28985 - 2007-06-26
affirm. ¶2 A jury found Hennings guilty of felony murder.[2] After judgment was entered, Hennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28985 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Jason Witak appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91738 - 2014-09-15
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Jason Witak appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. According
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524813 - 2022-05-24
, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. According
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524813 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
, V. WILLIAM P. PARI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50820 - 2014-09-15
, V. WILLIAM P. PARI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
which amended his judgment of conviction on a felony drug charge to provide additional presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19
which amended his judgment of conviction on a felony drug charge to provide additional presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William B. Bowers
to suppress. We determined that Bowers’ statements were not confidential and affirmed the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25991 - 2017-09-21
to suppress. We determined that Bowers’ statements were not confidential and affirmed the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seeking “to amend or modify [the] judgment of conviction.” (Capitalization omitted.) His motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231727 - 2019-01-03
seeking “to amend or modify [the] judgment of conviction.” (Capitalization omitted.) His motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231727 - 2019-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216040 - 2018-07-24
. Therefore, the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. The State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216040 - 2018-07-24