Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 32661 for SUBPOENA FORM.
Search results 651 - 660 of 32661 for SUBPOENA FORM.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the defense was not prejudiced because it actually subpoenaed several witnesses. The court signed an August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32640 - 2014-09-15
that the defense was not prejudiced because it actually subpoenaed several witnesses. The court signed an August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32640 - 2014-09-15
State v. William D. Taylor
burden to produce trial counsel, so he never subpoenaed him. Postconviction counsel was wrong—it was his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31
burden to produce trial counsel, so he never subpoenaed him. Postconviction counsel was wrong—it was his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subpoenaed Assistant District Attorney Kristin Schrank, the prosecutor who had appeared at the July 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
subpoenaed Assistant District Attorney Kristin Schrank, the prosecutor who had appeared at the July 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his request to subpoena witnesses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160562 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his request to subpoena witnesses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Nelson
Nelson asserts that his counsel was ineffective because he had not subpoenaed any witnesses for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2736 - 2017-09-19
Nelson asserts that his counsel was ineffective because he had not subpoenaed any witnesses for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2736 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
who had served as jurors for Cucuta’s trial were subpoenaed because Cucuta identified the sleeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
who had served as jurors for Cucuta’s trial were subpoenaed because Cucuta identified the sleeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
On a similar note, Graham asserts that so as to induce him to plead, his counsel did not subpoena a particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
On a similar note, Graham asserts that so as to induce him to plead, his counsel did not subpoena a particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
State v. Michael R. Nelson
Nelson asserts that his counsel was ineffective because he had not subpoenaed any witnesses for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31
Nelson asserts that his counsel was ineffective because he had not subpoenaed any witnesses for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that so as to induce him to plead, his counsel did not subpoena a particular detective for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
that so as to induce him to plead, his counsel did not subpoena a particular detective for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
served as jurors for Cucuta’s trial were subpoenaed because Cucuta identified the sleeping juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43255 - 2014-09-15
served as jurors for Cucuta’s trial were subpoenaed because Cucuta identified the sleeping juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43255 - 2014-09-15