Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 4828 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double Pulomerak Kota Cilegon Banten.
Search results 651 - 660 of 4828 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double Pulomerak Kota Cilegon Banten.
COURT OF APPEALS
had been acquitted are barred by double jeopardy or collateral estoppel. We grant the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44005 - 2009-11-30
had been acquitted are barred by double jeopardy or collateral estoppel. We grant the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44005 - 2009-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence violates the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29629 - 2007-07-09
sentence violates the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29629 - 2007-07-09
County of Rock v. Carol L. Poff-Mills
to an administrative suspension of her driving privileges under § 343.305(7) & (8), violates the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11075 - 2005-03-31
to an administrative suspension of her driving privileges under § 343.305(7) & (8), violates the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11075 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Carol L. Poff-Mills
), violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. We reject both arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND On February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11075 - 2017-09-19
), violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. We reject both arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND On February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11075 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was a factual basis for the pleas; (2) whether the circuit court violated Smith’s right to be free from double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1171971 - 2026-09-09
there was a factual basis for the pleas; (2) whether the circuit court violated Smith’s right to be free from double
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1171971 - 2026-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
was originally sentenced—violated his double jeopardy protections. We disagree. Armstrong did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83041 - 2012-05-29
was originally sentenced—violated his double jeopardy protections. We disagree. Armstrong did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83041 - 2012-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of limitations and Peterson should not receive a double recovery. The circuit court concluded American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74092 - 2011-11-21
of limitations and Peterson should not receive a double recovery. The circuit court concluded American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74092 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was a factual basis for the pleas; (2) whether the circuit court violated Smith’s right to be free from double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1171971 - 2026-09-09
there was a factual basis for the pleas; (2) whether the circuit court violated Smith’s right to be free from double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1171971 - 2026-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should not receive a double recovery. The circuit court concluded American Family was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74092 - 2014-09-15
should not receive a double recovery. The circuit court concluded American Family was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74092 - 2014-09-15
State v. Britten A.B.
physical abuse of a child and disorderly conduct, party to the crimes, violate his double jeopardy rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5297 - 2005-03-31
physical abuse of a child and disorderly conduct, party to the crimes, violate his double jeopardy rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5297 - 2005-03-31