Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 68967 for had.

[PDF] Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
in which they had been involved. The County gave them their paid time off but then asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Public Radio. Siewert explained that she had known Decker for five or six years, and during that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745622 - 2023-12-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his guilty plea. He had sought to withdraw the plea on the grounds that in the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231753 - 2019-01-08

[PDF] NOTICE
by stating that he ran from police because he “[had] warrants.” The State argued that, because Marinez had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56014 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Public Radio. Siewert explained that she had known Decker for five or six years, and during that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745622 - 2023-12-28

COURT OF APPEALS
Crossley testified he was concerned that his belongings had been “put out” on the street, based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38605 - 2009-08-03

Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
requested time off of work as a result of motor vehicle accidents in which they had been involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] NOTICE
the doorbell. ¶5 Crossley testified he was concerned that his belongings had been “put out” on the street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38605 - 2014-09-15

Tara J. Vanderperren v. Board of Bar Examiners
about certain events that had occurred before she was in law school; she also provided further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16645 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 The case proceeded to a jury trial. The State’s theory was that Mitchell and L.P. had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203611 - 2017-11-28