Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 4121 for in q.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The disputed testimony is as follows: Q. And after you created these photographs did you receive any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212399 - 2018-05-10

COURT OF APPEALS
this deficiency was brought out on direct examination, Gallentine’s counsel emphasized it on cross: Q Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01

[PDF] State v. Audell Hernandez
the trial. Q. And so then you did have a discussion with him regarding his right to testify? A. Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 41
the [teller] station into his -- he had on sweats. Down into his pocket or -- Q. When you saw his hand go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47188 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
it on cross: Q Okay. And you said that you found four out of the 12 markers that might match Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46611 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Victor K. Johnson
the prosecutor and Johnson: Q And do you agree with Ms. Zahn that there was a table where they have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16679 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
engaged in the following questioning of Savage's trial counsel: Q. Okay. Now, also [Savage
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318626 - 2021-03-01

State v. Victor K. Johnson
exchange occurred between the prosecutor and Johnson: Q And do you agree with Ms. Zahn
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16679 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kurt G. Culver
counsel: Q: Okay. Mr. Mares, as you sit here today, do you have a present recollection whether at any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4130 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The examination continued, eliciting the testimony disputed on appeal: Q: And has [this] affected your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85278 - 2012-07-23