Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 651 - 660 of 12458 for mr.
State v. Sidney Earl Rushing
Rushing appeared for a status date. Mr. Michelstetter informed the court that Rushing was dissatisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8847 - 2005-03-31
Rushing appeared for a status date. Mr. Michelstetter informed the court that Rushing was dissatisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8847 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William D. Purdy and Lisa Purdy v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
of the same judgment dismissing her complaint against Heritage. William Purdy was injured and Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8633 - 2017-09-19
of the same judgment dismissing her complaint against Heritage. William Purdy was injured and Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8633 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
agreed to handle Mr. Madden’s case after the co-defendants, and that’s based on Mr. Madden’s degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66201 - 2011-06-20
Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon
, 1993. The divorce decree awarded an equal division of property. Mr. Kenyon was awarded the family
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16691 - 2005-03-31
, 1993. The divorce decree awarded an equal division of property. Mr. Kenyon was awarded the family
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16691 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon
of property. Mr. Kenyon was awarded the family residence and was ordered to make the mortgage payment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16691 - 2017-09-21
of property. Mr. Kenyon was awarded the family residence and was ordered to make the mortgage payment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16691 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leamon Hoover
of the victim, Mr. Bynum. …. [I]t’s definitely going to be an identification case. Did the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14784 - 2005-03-31
of the victim, Mr. Bynum. …. [I]t’s definitely going to be an identification case. Did the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14784 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
that the restrictions only apply to Mr. Schaefer's lumbosacral spine and does not apply to any other organ system
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82380 - 2012-07-24
that the restrictions only apply to Mr. Schaefer's lumbosacral spine and does not apply to any other organ system
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82380 - 2012-07-24
State v. Kenneth Golden
(1)(b) convicted of a felony, robbery. You understand that? MR. GOLDEN: Yes, I understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12905 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b) convicted of a felony, robbery. You understand that? MR. GOLDEN: Yes, I understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barry L. Ball
and instructions of Mr.—of Mr. Hess. Mr. Hess was never the target of Mr. Ball’s violent conduct. That is, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2795 - 2017-09-19
and instructions of Mr.—of Mr. Hess. Mr. Hess was never the target of Mr. Ball’s violent conduct. That is, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2795 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Stankiewicz
of a crime for [the officer] to first, stop and question Mr. Stankiewicz and then whether there was probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31
of a crime for [the officer] to first, stop and question Mr. Stankiewicz and then whether there was probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10828 - 2005-03-31