Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.

Richard Engberg v. Brett Eric Reetz
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 CANE, C.J. This consolidated appeal involves legal malpractice claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18322 - 2005-05-31

Richard Engberg v. Brett Eric Reetz
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 CANE, C.J. This consolidated appeal involves legal malpractice claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18323 - 2005-05-31

[PDF] Richard Engberg v. Brett Eric Reetz
legal malpractice claims and insurance coverage questions arising from a real estate transaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18322 - 2017-09-21

City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
was accomplished on April 25. The raze order was published on April 26 and recorded with the register of deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-11-03

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
on April 26 and recorded with the register of deeds on April 28. On November 9, 1999, the City razed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Alex NMI Skoullou
was damaged in an amount less than $1000. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Pearl A. Powers v. Thomas F. Powers
. The undisputed facts are that on April 13, 1990, Thomas and Pearl executed a quitclaim deed of the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11947 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of Interest by drafting a quitclaim deed relinquishing any interest in the eighty-acre parcel, the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32295 - 2008-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
detail below, the court concluded that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101610 - 2013-09-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity based on evidence extrinsic to the deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101610 - 2017-09-21