Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 77620 for search which.
Search results 651 - 660 of 77620 for search which.
COURT OF APPEALS
for written consent to further search the residence. He handed Deborah a notebook on which he had drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59520 - 2011-02-24
for written consent to further search the residence. He handed Deborah a notebook on which he had drawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59520 - 2011-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Jones
name was after the search in which Mischka found the pipe. Jones argues that this false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
name was after the search in which Mischka found the pipe. Jones argues that this false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert F. Jones
. Thus, Mischka did not have a plain view of the pipe, which could have justified the search. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
. Thus, Mischka did not have a plain view of the pipe, which could have justified the search. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Derrick C. Evans
, is entitled to challenge a search of a garage belonging to his host; and (2) whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8108 - 2017-09-19
, is entitled to challenge a search of a garage belonging to his host; and (2) whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8108 - 2017-09-19
State v. Derrick C. Evans
., "whether the disputed search and seizure has infringed an interest of the defendant which the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2005-03-31
., "whether the disputed search and seizure has infringed an interest of the defendant which the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the officer opened the rear driver side door, which the State concedes was a search, it was Dillard who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355091 - 2021-04-13
the officer opened the rear driver side door, which the State concedes was a search, it was Dillard who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355091 - 2021-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the search of his friend’s apartment and basement, the police did not have exigent circumstances to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26
the search of his friend’s apartment and basement, the police did not have exigent circumstances to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the apartment, the officers also asked Mallory for consent to search the basement, which was accessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
the apartment, the officers also asked Mallory for consent to search the basement, which was accessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Romel D.
police did not have a reasonable suspicion to initially stop him and, thus, the subsequent search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
police did not have a reasonable suspicion to initially stop him and, thus, the subsequent search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
State v. Romel D.
search yielding cocaine was illegal. Because the combination of Romel D.’s actions and his presence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
search yielding cocaine was illegal. Because the combination of Romel D.’s actions and his presence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31