Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6501 - 6510 of 69082 for as he.
Search results 6501 - 6510 of 69082 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. He claims: (1) the trial court erred in not suppressing his confession; (2) the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101726 - 2017-09-21
relief. He claims: (1) the trial court erred in not suppressing his confession; (2) the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101726 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric L. Small
, as a habitual offender.[1] See §§ 943.32(1)(a), 939.62, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14166 - 2005-03-31
, as a habitual offender.[1] See §§ 943.32(1)(a), 939.62, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, he saw two men get into separate vehicles that had been parked near Xiong’s house, then each drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
, he saw two men get into separate vehicles that had been parked near Xiong’s house, then each drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
State v. James D. Paulson
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
State v. George Reed
to §§ 940.01(1), 939.05 and 941.29(2), Stats. He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 940.01(1), 939.05 and 941.29(2), Stats. He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James D. Paulson
§ 350.10(1)(d) and an order denying his reconsideration motion.2 He argues that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
§ 350.10(1)(d) and an order denying his reconsideration motion.2 He argues that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop him and were justified in requesting a weapons frisk. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30846 - 2014-09-15
that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop him and were justified in requesting a weapons frisk. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30846 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Valtierrez
and had appeared to be reaching for a weapon when he fired at him. 2 ¶4 Following his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5517 - 2017-09-19
and had appeared to be reaching for a weapon when he fired at him. 2 ¶4 Following his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5517 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in requesting a weapons frisk. He argues that all evidence resulting from the encounter should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30846 - 2007-11-13
in requesting a weapons frisk. He argues that all evidence resulting from the encounter should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30846 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
Michael C. McVeigh, M.D. v. John T. Grum, M.D.
as the other shareholders. He was told that he would be subject to the identical terms of the last written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14458 - 2017-09-21
as the other shareholders. He was told that he would be subject to the identical terms of the last written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14458 - 2017-09-21