Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65061 - 65070 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 65061 - 65070 of 74688 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2019AP682-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264335 - 2020-06-17
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2019AP682-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264335 - 2020-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110571 - 2017-09-21
2 Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carolyn A. Smiley v. William A. Smiley
properly exercises its discretion when it articulates a reasoned decision based on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7796 - 2017-09-19
properly exercises its discretion when it articulates a reasoned decision based on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7796 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no- merit report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
a supplemental no- merit report. Upon this court’s independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
, any records, documents, or statements that fell within the ambit of the subpoena, a bench warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109635 - 2014-03-31
, any records, documents, or statements that fell within the ambit of the subpoena, a bench warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109635 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Joseph Kovach
to be less than .10%. It eventually determined, without any evidence in the record, that the breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25460 - 2017-09-21
to be less than .10%. It eventually determined, without any evidence in the record, that the breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25460 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David S. Frederick
defense. See § 971.13(1), STATS. The record of Frederick’s plea hearing conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11535 - 2017-09-19
defense. See § 971.13(1), STATS. The record of Frederick’s plea hearing conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11535 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314078 - 2020-12-16
factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314078 - 2020-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presented no evidence in support of his petition. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133743 - 2017-09-21
presented no evidence in support of his petition. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133743 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Jeopardy Clause. Based upon No. 2019AP587-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277314 - 2020-08-12
Jeopardy Clause. Based upon No. 2019AP587-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277314 - 2020-08-12