Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65071 - 65080 of 68575 for law.

Monica and Paul Kaplewski v. CS & DS, Ltd.
summary judgment was appropriately granted presents a question of law that we review independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2568 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Trenton v. City of West Bend
, applied a proper standard of law and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15016 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
maximum allowed by law. Such a sentence is presumptively not unduly harsh. See id., ¶32. We cannot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128829 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
errors warrant a mistrial, and “the law prefers less drastic alternatives, if available and practical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56183 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
to the facts of the case, each arguing for a different result. The question thus raised is one of law, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10789 - 2017-09-20

State v. Paul L. Vogel
to undisputed facts, which is a question of law this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14683 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
to judgment as a matter of law. Id. This action stems from Wisnefske defaulting on his land contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
facts, applied the correct law, and using a rational process reaches a reasonable result.” Lenticular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
of performance and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56182 - 2010-11-01