Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65071 - 65080 of 83778 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
obligation. ¶3 Although Wisconsin case law recognizes that, as Wis. Stat. § 973.20(7) permits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40237 - 2009-08-31

[PDF] Robert L. Worthon v. Jeffrey Endicott
an adequate statement of the reasons for its decision "will vary from case to case depending on the severity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8399 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Douglas E. Kaminski
in which this case was charged or Kaminski’s claim that his convictions on counts one, three and five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13986 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this No. 2020AP1170 2 case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363212 - 2021-05-05

[PDF] NOTICE
“Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29857 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, the fact that the cases were terminated by pleas rather than lengthy trials, Dorman’s apparent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20

State v. La Rance Thacker
court excluded the evidence on the basis of relevance. In such case, counsel should have made an offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7901 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93668 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
is more than a possibility” and is assessed on a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31637 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
property in northern Wisconsin on Spider Lake. This case was previously before us. See O’Connell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33679 - 2008-08-06