Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6511 - 6520 of 49955 for civil+disposition+summary+.
Search results 6511 - 6520 of 49955 for civil+disposition+summary+.
CA Blank Order
District I March 31, 2014 To: Hon. Jane V. Carroll Milwaukee County Courthouse Civil/Small Claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109855 - 2014-03-30
District I March 31, 2014 To: Hon. Jane V. Carroll Milwaukee County Courthouse Civil/Small Claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109855 - 2014-03-30
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Dr. James and Mrs. Sally Fritz. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Dr. James and Mrs. Sally Fritz. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
A Teacher's Guide to the Wisconsin Courts
, of which I am one, are trial judges, hearing and deciding both criminal and civil cases. Criminal cases
/courts/resources/teacher/docs/teacherguide.pdf - 2010-01-20
, of which I am one, are trial judges, hearing and deciding both criminal and civil cases. Criminal cases
/courts/resources/teacher/docs/teacherguide.pdf - 2010-01-20
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. Tamara J. Knuth
in this civil forfeiture action. The County is correct. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis.2d 431, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15480 - 2017-09-21
in this civil forfeiture action. The County is correct. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis.2d 431, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15480 - 2017-09-21
Eau Claire County v. Tamara J. Knuth
OMVWI in this civil forfeiture action. The County is correct. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15480 - 2005-03-31
OMVWI in this civil forfeiture action. The County is correct. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15480 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the court proceed to the dispositional phase. During this phase of the proceedings "the court is called
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235273 - 2019-04-11
the court proceed to the dispositional phase. During this phase of the proceedings "the court is called
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235273 - 2019-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. J.W. (L.C. # 2016TP150) Before Kessler, J. 1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207264 - 2018-01-17
. J.W. (L.C. # 2016TP150) Before Kessler, J. 1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207264 - 2018-01-17
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
to amounts claimed on a court-ordered restitution summary accompanying a presentence investigation, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
to amounts claimed on a court-ordered restitution summary accompanying a presentence investigation, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
Indemnity Company (Lowe) appeal a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment.[1] Lowe claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31
Indemnity Company (Lowe) appeal a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment.[1] Lowe claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment. 1 Lowe claims the court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment. 1 Lowe claims the court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19