Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6511 - 6520 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
that our review of this issue is de novo because it involves an issue of constitutional law. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31

Elizabeth Lornitzo v. Frank Lornitzo
which we decide de novo. Old Tuckaway Assoc. Ltd. Partnership v. City of Greenfield, 180 Wis.2d 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7782 - 2010-03-31

Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Gerber in an unrelated incident. See Merritt v. De Los Santos, 721 F.2d 598, 601 (7th Cir. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12157 - 2005-03-31

July 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
06-15-2006 Affirmed 2005AP002994 CR State v. Earl J. De Cloux
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26183 - 2006-08-08

COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56881 - 2010-11-17

State v. Carolyn A. Sullivan
review de novo. Krier, 165 Wis.2d at 676, 478 N.W.2d at 65. The relevant factual findings in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13952 - 2005-03-31

State v. Paul A. Balthazor
police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of law, subject to de novo review. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6967 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
District II April 15, 2015 To: Hon. Linda M. Van De Water Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139597 - 2015-04-14

State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is de novo. See State v. Fields, 2001 WI App 297, ¶5, 249 Wis. 2d 292, 296, 638 N.W.2d 897, 899. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
they are clearly erroneous, but determine deficient performance and prejudice de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95673 - 2013-04-22