Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6511 - 6520 of 12426 for mr.
Search results 6511 - 6520 of 12426 for mr.
WI App 105 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP178-CR Complete Title...
sentence that Mr. Trepanier has been serving. The time that he has spent in custody is first attributable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121817 - 2014-10-28
sentence that Mr. Trepanier has been serving. The time that he has spent in custody is first attributable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121817 - 2014-10-28
[PDF]
WI APP 2
began. The following exchange took place: [Buchanan]: I went there with the intention of asking Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158329 - 2017-09-21
began. The following exchange took place: [Buchanan]: I went there with the intention of asking Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
. Bales’ testimony, as well as Mr. Ogden’s, … there is a substantial probability of physical harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703287 - 2023-09-14
. Bales’ testimony, as well as Mr. Ogden’s, … there is a substantial probability of physical harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703287 - 2023-09-14
[PDF]
WI APP 115
and privileges previously granted to Mr. & Mrs. McEssey by means of [the 1967 agreement].” The McEsseys did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33042 - 2014-09-15
and privileges previously granted to Mr. & Mrs. McEssey by means of [the 1967 agreement].” The McEsseys did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33042 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
to this effect. Kenyon’s attorney then argued, “if the Court were to incarcerate Mr. Kenyon … Mr. Kenyon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
to this effect. Kenyon’s attorney then argued, “if the Court were to incarcerate Mr. Kenyon … Mr. Kenyon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
” because “Mr. Bateman had no personal knowledge of who or where the documents [attached to his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121273 - 2014-09-09
” because “Mr. Bateman had no personal knowledge of who or where the documents [attached to his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121273 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Dion C. Mitchell
the following colloquy with Mitchell: THE COURT: Mr. Mitchell, did you hear the facts as stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19
the following colloquy with Mitchell: THE COURT: Mr. Mitchell, did you hear the facts as stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
11 stands for the proposition that “a prior judicial determination that Mr. Bolstad had refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16010 - 2017-09-21
11 stands for the proposition that “a prior judicial determination that Mr. Bolstad had refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16010 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 118
prohibiting the defense from referring to any alleged conduct by Mr. Goehl that falls under this category
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33090 - 2011-06-14
prohibiting the defense from referring to any alleged conduct by Mr. Goehl that falls under this category
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33090 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court explained: Counsel had detailed notes regarding her conversations with Mr. Hoffman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
. The court explained: Counsel had detailed notes regarding her conversations with Mr. Hoffman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18