Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 49990 for civil+disposition+summary+.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 49990 for civil+disposition+summary+.
Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
the district for a frivolous summary judgment motion pursuant to § 814.025, Stats.[2] Both Tennyson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2012-03-30
the district for a frivolous summary judgment motion pursuant to § 814.025, Stats.[2] Both Tennyson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15264 - 2012-03-30
[PDF]
State v. Randall McConochie
to collaterally attack the prior civil forfeiture determination was wrongly denied. We are not persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19
to collaterally attack the prior civil forfeiture determination was wrongly denied. We are not persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randall McConochie
(2)(b). He contends that his motion to collaterally attack the prior civil forfeiture determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31
(2)(b). He contends that his motion to collaterally attack the prior civil forfeiture determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
to amounts claimed on a court-ordered restitution summary accompanying a presentence investigation, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
to amounts claimed on a court-ordered restitution summary accompanying a presentence investigation, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
Indemnity Company (Lowe) appeal a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment.[1] Lowe claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31
Indemnity Company (Lowe) appeal a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment.[1] Lowe claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment. 1 Lowe claims the court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
a nonfinal order denying their motion for summary judgment. 1 Lowe claims the court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Edwin C. West v. Phil Macht
2 summary judgment against him, Edwin C. West argues that he was reassigned to a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15699 - 2017-09-21
2 summary judgment against him, Edwin C. West argues that he was reassigned to a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - October
for summary judgment. Saint John’s owns a 5.02 acre parcel of land in Milwaukee, where it operates
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsoct2022.pdf - 2022-09-29
for summary judgment. Saint John’s owns a 5.02 acre parcel of land in Milwaukee, where it operates
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsoct2022.pdf - 2022-09-29
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2022
for summary judgment. Saint John’s owns a 5.02 acre parcel of land in Milwaukee, where it operates
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573579 - 2022-09-29
for summary judgment. Saint John’s owns a 5.02 acre parcel of land in Milwaukee, where it operates
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573579 - 2022-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
the instruction before it went to the jury; (2) the instruction was not an accurate summary of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28215 - 2014-09-15
the instruction before it went to the jury; (2) the instruction was not an accurate summary of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28215 - 2014-09-15