Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 16451 for commentating.

State v. Randy J. Stahl
Here, it is plain from the circuit court’s comments at the sentencing hearing that the principal reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30

[PDF] State v. Laurie Beu
commented that “this story, of course, is replete with problems and management of Ms. Beu’s multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12862 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of factual information and explanatory comments. ¶4 Later, the jury asked to see, among other exhibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of sentence. We are not convinced that parole eligibility played a role in the sentence. The comment came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33548 - 2008-07-29

State v. Anthony F. Skibba, Sr.
, Janes was not the only witness to comment on it. ¶12 With respect to the lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3282 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
.2d 197. Boehm had the opportunity, through his counsel, to comment on the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court’s comment was in keeping with Schulpius, where the Wisconsin Supreme Court discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the woman because she had made sexually explicit comments during the ride home, told him to come into her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
2 He also comments that the lieutenant did not accuse him of driving at varying speeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42728 - 2014-09-15

State v. Amanda A. Ringler
or sarcastic remarks or comments about one another. ¶4 While Ringler’s counsel is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3984 - 2005-03-31