Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 63539 for records.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 63539 for records.
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, Iddings’ response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
, Iddings’ response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Patton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13
of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Patton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
might reasonably waive the preliminary hearing and rely on informal discovery. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
might reasonably waive the preliminary hearing and rely on informal discovery. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667863 - 2023-06-13
not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667863 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109722 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109722 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that were not in the appellate record.[1] We conclude that most of Brown’s allegations are procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44824 - 2009-12-21
that were not in the appellate record.[1] We conclude that most of Brown’s allegations are procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44824 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132452 - 2017-09-21
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132452 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Lawrence’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Lawrence’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07
State v. Michael J. Burgus
of the record, this court concludes that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8667 - 2005-03-31
of the record, this court concludes that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177521 - 2017-09-21
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177521 - 2017-09-21