Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6531 - 6540 of 65116 for or b.

[PDF] WI 74
:1.15(b)(4).3 In 52 of the investigations
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67976 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] The Third Branch, fall 2012
T h ir d B ra n ch a p u b li c a ti o n o f th e W is c o n s in J u d ic ia
/news/thirdbranch/docs/fall12.pdf - 2012-12-12

[PDF] WI Veterans Treatment Court performance measures
............................................................................... 52 Appendix A: Charge Categories for Criminal Histories .......... A-1 Appendix B
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/veteransperfmeasures.pdf - 2023-01-04

[PDF] State v. David S. Stenklyft
). As Stenklyft did not have grounds for sentence adjustment under § 973.195(1r)(b)3., the circuit court would
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18504 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 972.11(2)(b)3. (2023-24),2 nor that he was constitutionally entitled to present such evidence at his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2020
in the Jurisdictional Offer.” Christus Lutheran argued that this failure violated Wis. Stat. § 32.05(2) (b) and (3)(e
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292469 - 2020-09-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of: (a) Three years from the date of the injury, or (b) One year from the date the injury was discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780113 - 2024-03-26

State v. Jeremy Armstrong
detector” has the meaning given in s. 111.37 (1) (b). (b) “Polygraph” has the meaning given in s. 111.37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14178 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. For abandonment, the focus is “on the parent’s contact, or lack of contact, with the child.” Carla B. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936230 - 2025-04-03

Daniel R. Zawistowski v. Tammra S. Zawistowski
or adjusted base that constitutes the child support obligation shall be: …. (b) 25% for 2 children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3696 - 2005-03-31