Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6531 - 6540 of 17239 for probate/1000.
Search results 6531 - 6540 of 17239 for probate/1000.
State v. Craig A. Felten
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3917 - 2013-10-16
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3917 - 2013-10-16
State v. Craig A. Felten
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3918 - 2013-10-16
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3918 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2013
of probation “[c]onsecutive to count 1.” However, DOC failed to enter into its computer record system
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102487 - 2017-09-21
of probation “[c]onsecutive to count 1.” However, DOC failed to enter into its computer record system
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
charge, the court imposed and stayed a sentence of 16 years imprisonment and placed Lira on probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455038 - 2022-01-20
charge, the court imposed and stayed a sentence of 16 years imprisonment and placed Lira on probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455038 - 2022-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
). ¶14 Crandall complains the court did not give adequate consideration to probation. However, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27267 - 2006-11-27
). ¶14 Crandall complains the court did not give adequate consideration to probation. However, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27267 - 2006-11-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenge to the plea on this ground. Next, Vollmer claims that he was forced to tell his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
challenge to the plea on this ground. Next, Vollmer claims that he was forced to tell his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
offer the State made was for four months in jail as a condition of probation. However, after Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15
offer the State made was for four months in jail as a condition of probation. However, after Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael L., Jr.
Michael L. on probation, as the parties jointly requested. The trial court also ordered Michael L. to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
Michael L. on probation, as the parties jointly requested. The trial court also ordered Michael L. to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5302 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
in treatment at two facilites. Both parents were or had been on probation. One condition for return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2005-03-31
in treatment at two facilites. Both parents were or had been on probation. One condition for return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
” that the last plea offer the State made was for four months in jail as a condition of probation. However, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
” that the last plea offer the State made was for four months in jail as a condition of probation. However, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31